<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Values and Measurements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/values-and-measurements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/values-and-measurements/</link>
	<description>Why blog?  I think this quote from Henry Chesbrough says it all, &#34;Open Innovation is fundamentally about operating in a world of abundant knowledge, where not all the smart people work for you, so you better go find them, connect to them, and build upon what they can do.” The postings on this site are my own and don&#039;t necessarily represent IBM&#039;s.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samiq</title>
		<link>http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/values-and-measurements/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Samiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-27</guid>
		<description>now think about this scenario in government agencies, if only there could be space for ideas like this to nurture. 

problem I think is sticking to the status quo of things. sometimes things don&#039;t change just because there are no ideas, but because we don&#039;t see them feasible from the point we stand. we need people that seats outside the bounds for a while, then comes and re-architects, a little at a time, but change is in.

wished this kind of talks were made available more broadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now think about this scenario in government agencies, if only there could be space for ideas like this to nurture. </p>
<p>problem I think is sticking to the status quo of things. sometimes things don&#8217;t change just because there are no ideas, but because we don&#8217;t see them feasible from the point we stand. we need people that seats outside the bounds for a while, then comes and re-architects, a little at a time, but change is in.</p>
<p>wished this kind of talks were made available more broadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Gauthier</title>
		<link>http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/values-and-measurements/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Gauthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibmzrl.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-25</guid>
		<description>The bigger a company, the less it will make room for breaking the (huge) assets that took so much time and resources to build.

This makes it increasingly difficult for BigCo&#039;s to only consider the figures you are referring too.

Therefore innovation is too often seen as a threat rather than as an opportunity -which is very bad news for BigCo&#039;s in the first place because there are the playground where innovation could (significantly) help (substancial) figures look (much) better.

That&#039;s the only (sad) reason why startups disrupt encumbants (a game that they obviously would prefer not to play).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bigger a company, the less it will make room for breaking the (huge) assets that took so much time and resources to build.</p>
<p>This makes it increasingly difficult for BigCo&#8217;s to only consider the figures you are referring too.</p>
<p>Therefore innovation is too often seen as a threat rather than as an opportunity -which is very bad news for BigCo&#8217;s in the first place because there are the playground where innovation could (significantly) help (substancial) figures look (much) better.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the only (sad) reason why startups disrupt encumbants (a game that they obviously would prefer not to play).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
